Fifty years after the discovery of the first direct genetic link to cancer, scientists are assessing the state of so-called targeted therapy â€” with nearly 30 treatments on the market and a dozen or so more under study.
â€œWeâ€™re still not using the â€˜Câ€™ word, â€˜cure,â€™â€ cautioned personalized medicine director Jeff Boyd of Fox Chase Cancer Center, who helped organized a meeting in Philadelphia today to mark the anniversary and examine the future of targeted therapy.
But, he added, â€œthere is real potential to transform many cancers into chronic diseases.â€
One next challenge is how to expand the number of targets to attack, in part by answering what the new chief of the National Cancer Institute calls the â€œbig questionsâ€ about what makes this disease so intractable.
Questions like: What makes a tumor metastasize, or spread through the body? Metastasis is what kills, yet scientists donâ€™t know why some tumors spread and others donâ€™t, and what programs those tumor cells to invade, say, the liver instead of the bone or the lung â€” factors that undoubtedly could be new treatment targets.
Starting in October, Dr. Harold Varmus, the NCIâ€™s director, will begin quizzing top researchers from around the country about which of oncologyâ€™s underlying mysteries should be part of his â€œBig Questions Initiative,â€ a new focus of government cancer research.
Answering those questions â€œwould get you over a roadblock that keeps us from making better progress,â€ Varmus told a meeting of his scientific advisers earlier this month.
For Dr. Otis Brawley of the American Cancer Society, such a project might finally offer clues to a huge problem facing patients today: How to tell who needs the most aggressive treatment, and who would be OK skipping the big guns.
A domino effect of genetic alterations is required to cause any of the 200 diseases collectively called cancer. Some occur in the person, making them more prone to illness. But tumors also have their own genetic signature â€” four to seven genetic changes that are critical to turning, say, a normal breast or colon or liver cell into a cancerous one, and a pattern of activity that signals how aggressive that malignancy will be. Those unique patterns also offer targets for treatment, drugs that zero in on the particular genetic pathways fueling the personâ€™s cancer â€” and even vaccine-like therapies, a fledgling field that aims to train patientsâ€™ immune systems to recognize and fight their tumors.
It all started with the 1960 publication of what was dubbed the Philadelphia chromosome, a funny-looking chromosome that two scientists â€” one from the University of Pennsylvania, one from Fox Chase â€” spotted only in patients with a specific kind of leukemia. Fast-forward to the 2001 approval of the groundbreaking drug Gleevec, which has turned chronic myeloid leukemia from a fast killer into a disease that many patients today manage with a daily pill. It works by targeting the cancer-causing protein produced by the Philadelphia chromosome.
Gleevec wasnâ€™t the first genetic targeted therapy for cancer â€” the decades of research sparked by that discovery actually paid off for some other cancers first.
Boyd predicts there will be more than 100 targeted therapies available within several more years, and the real quest is for targets that prove as crucial to holding cancer in check as Gleevecâ€™s did.,
Generating particular excitement now are possible new drugs for hard-to-treat breast cancer, compounds called PARP inhibitors that block enzymes needed for cell growth.